Residents of a “boundary road” to one of Lambeth’s low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) yesterday (5 December) used a Streatham church to voice anger and frustration about the effect the LTN has had on them.
In front of them in St Peter’s on Leigham Court Road – the road in question – were five Lambeth councilllors and Streatham MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy.
Organised by residents of the road, the meeting was hosted by the vicar of St Peter’s, Steffan Mathias.
LTNs cause more pollution for the majority of Lambeth residents for the privileged few to have a private road . All this if you’re against LTNs ‘ what your proposals are to reduce traffic, increase walking and cycling, and improve air quality’ is a load of bullshit and a distraction from the reality LTNs cause more harm than good.
LTN advocates gaslight those of us that point out our surrounding roads roads are constantly congested making life worse for the majority of residents
POISONING WITH YOUR NEIGHBORS WITH MORE POLLUTION DOES NOT HELP CLIMATE CHANGE OR ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO CYCLE
Leander private road (LTN) has no schools but plenty of car owners. The adjacent road Brixton Hill has a 1000 kids going to school, plus many other catching buses to go to schools in the surrounding area. All suffer more pollution thanx to Leander private road (LTN), 15 lambeth councilors finally gain from living in an LTN, Their house prices rise as much as the extra pollution they push on the rest of us.
Remember LTNs were introduced with the help and advise of the london cycling campaign an institutionally racist organization. Who block people from twitter who reports racism in their ranks. The LCC only took action once the press got hold of the story. The perpetrator directly advised Claire Holland (LTN advocate leader of Lambeth Labour) Interesting to note most LTN are in middle class white areas and they have a detrimental effect on Black and other minorities health.
If you’re against LTNs, it would be interesting to hear what your proposals are to reduce traffic, increase walking and cycling, and improve air quality. From what I’ve heard, all the anti-LTNs just want business as usual, which already means illegal air quality, zero kids on bikes, and horrendous traffic that’s getting worse every year. LTNs have been put in place all over Europe and are an effective long-term way to reduce car use. Screaming and shouting because they haven’t worked in a few months is pointless because it can take several years to change people’s behaviour. I applaud Lambeth Council for having the balls to implement these schemes.
POISONING WITH YOUR NEIGHBORS WITH MORE POLLUTION DOES NOT HELP CLIMATE CHANGE OR ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO CYCLE.
LTN advocates gaslight those of us that live on boundary roads that have increase traffic
THe road to hell is paved with middle class gentrifiers who are happy to pollute other people’s children to gain a private road and increase their house prices
The facts and figures Lambeth give out are completely biased. Or course there are fewer cars in the ltn. The roads are blocked!. The displacement of traffic to other roads apparently is not happening. I think they have missed the traffic jams ( and pollution ) on Croxted Road, Norwood Road and Christchurch Road. It’s completely ludicrous to pass within two minutes of my home and have to drive, sometimes an extra twenty minutes. Great for the pollution levels!.
100%
We are being sacrifised for a few to have a private road while the rest of us endure more pollution.
The selfish gene is strong in LTN advocates, usually people that have recently moved in the area telling those of us that have lived here for decades the traffic has evaporated.
Yeah from their private road it has but at the expense of the rest of us
Thanks for reporting this.
Despite the fact that all Lambeth LTNs have resulted in significant traffic displacement onto many boundary roads Lambeth are proclaiming them as a success as they say that traffic is down across the area. However, this statement appears to be based on unreliable baselines and only TWO periods of 7 day traffic counts in 12 months with no proper utilisation of SCOOT traffic light data to identify idling
hotspots
The Council are telling us that they will offer mitigations for the extra traffic on the boundary roads (a situation they have created) including green screens at schools, but what about the congested roads some of these children live on and walk, scoot, cycle along the get to school?
It’s a real worry that none of the Cllrs present including the LTN portfolio holder knew whether anyone had spoken to Public Health Director about these schemes.
TfL Moto is keep London moving. How do they think making people sit in stationery traffic driving further will help. Any statistics showing less traffic after LTN will be due to homeworking or ulez but will be championed as a result of LTN